Reproductive potential of male calanoid copepod Sinodiaptomus (Rhinediaptomus) indicus Kiefer: A potential live prey for fish larvae
Downloads
Copepods are a morphologically, physiologically, and ecologically highly diverse group with different reproductive characteristics and have evolved structural specialties of sperm form and spermatophore structure. These reproductive peculiarities are important for their implications in applied biology. Copepods are the preferred food for finfish and shellfish larvae due to their optimal size range and nutritive value. Although many copepod species are successfully mass-cultured, limited success is still reported in commercial-level production for use in aquaculture hatcheries. Unlike rotifers and Artemia, which reproduce by parthenogenesis and attain high-density production easily, copepods reproduce sexually, involving mate selection, a copulatory process, and leading to the transfer of spermatophores and fertilization of eggs. This necessitates an understanding of the reproductive biology of cultivable copepod species to establish effective culture protocols. The freshwater calanoid copepod Sinodiaptomus (Rhinediaptomus) indicus is a promising candidate for mass culture, and this article describes the reproductive biology of the male using histological and electron microscopic studies. The ultrastructure of the spermatozoon of this species is reported for the first time. Laboratory experiments showed long lifespan and high spermatophore production (34 in 25 days) in this animal, which is a key factor in deciding male-female ratio formulation in the inoculum for mass culture. It is suggested that the S. (R.) indicus could be an ideal species for mass culture and use as live feed in fish and prawn larval rearing.
Downloads
Ali A.K., Primicerio R., Folstad I. (2014). Female morphology and male mating success in the calanoid copepod, Eudiaptomus graciloides. Journal of Plankton Research, 36(5): 1216-1223.
Altaff K. (2003). Breeding biology of the freshwater copepod, Heliodiaptomus viduus (Gurney) and its prospects as live food organism. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 46: 180-187.
Altaff K. (2004). A manual of zooplankton. University Grants Commission, New Delhi. 155 p.
Altaff K. (2020). Indigenous live feed for aqua-hatchery larval rearing of finfish and shellfish: A review. International Journal of Zoological Investigations, 6(1): 162-173.
Altaff K., Vijayaraj R. (2021). Micro-algal diet for copepod culture with reference to their nutritive value–A review. International Journal of Current Research and Review, 13(07): 86.
Aman S., Altaff K. (2004) Biochemical profile of Heliodiaptomus viduus, Sinodiaptomus (R) indicus and Mesocyclops aspericornis and their dietary evaluation for post larvae of Macrobrachium resenbergii, Zoological Studies, 43: 267-275
Blades P.I., Youngbluth M.J. (1980). Morphological, physiological, and behavioral aspects of mating in calanoid copepods. Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities, 3: 39.
Blades-Eckelbarger P.I. (1986). Aspects of internal anatomy and reproduction in the Copepoda. Syllogeus, 58: 26-50.
Blades-Eckelbrager P.I. (1991). Functional morphology of spermatophores and sperm transfer in calanoid copepods. Crustacean Sexual Biology, 246-270.
Dharani G., Altaff K. (2004). Ultra structure of subitaneous and diapausing eggs of planktonic copepod Sinodiaptomus (Rhinediaptomus) indicus, Current Science, 87: 109-112
Ershova E.A., Kosobokova K.N. (2012). Morphology of genital system and reproductive biology of the Arctic calanoid copepod Metridia longa. Biology Bulletin, 39(8): 676-683.
Fernandez J.G., Ingber D.E. (2013). Bioinspired chitinous material solutions for environmental sustainability and medicine. Advanced Functional Materials, 23(36): 4454-4466.
Hopkins C.C.E. (1978). The male genital system, and spermatophore production and function in Euchaeta norvegica Boeck (Copepoda: Calanoida). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 35(3): 197-231.
Mehrajuddin W., Altaff K., Mohammed A.H. (2011) Growth and survival of larval snakehead, Channa striatus (Bloch, 1793) fed different live feed organisms. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 11: 523-528.
Ohtsuka S., Huys R. (2001). Sexual dimorphism in calanoid copepods: morphology and function. Hydrobiologia, 453(1): 441-466.
Østergaard P., Boxshall G.A. (2004). Giant females and dwarf males: a comparative study of nuptial organs in female Chondracanthidae (Crustacea: Copepoda). Zoologischer Anzeiger-A Journal of Comparative Zoology, 243(1-2): 65-74.
Pantin C.F.A. (1964). Notes on microscopic technique for zoologists. Cambridge University Press. 76 p.
Park T.S. (1966). The biology of a calanoid copepod Epilabidocera amphitrites McMurrich. Cellule, 66: 127-251.
Patki I.R., Balachandra B.I., Jeevaji I.H. (1987). An introduction to microtechnique. S. Chand and Co, New Delhi. 78 p.
Reddy Y.R. (1994). Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae: Key to the genera Heliodiaptomus, Allodiaptomus, Neodiaptomus, Phyllodiaptomus, Eodiaptomus, Arctodiaptomus and Sinodiaptomus. SPB SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, Netherlands. 221 p.
Santhanam P., Jeyaraj N., Jothiraj K., Ananth S., Kumar S.D., Pachiappan P. (2019). Evaluation of the suitability of marine copepods as an alternative live feed in high-health fish larval production. Basic and Applied Zooplankton Biology, 277-292.
Santhosh B., Anil, M. K., Muhammed Anzeer F., Aneesh K.S., Abraham M.V., Gopakumar G., Unnikrishnan C. (2018). Culture Techniques of Marine Copepods. ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, Kerala, India. 144 p.
Sheriff A., Altaff K. (1993). Remating in the planktonic copepod Heliodiaptomus viduus (Gurney). Journal of Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 5(2): 58-60.
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Aquatic Biology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







